2018 NCAA Free Picks – College Basketball [Easy Winners]

Getty Villanova has been one of the most consistent teams in college basketball. Not saying that Iona will win, but I see them hanging around for most of this game until Marvin Bagley takes over. The Cubs pitchers as a team have surrendered base knocks and earned runs this season. UNC Wilmington played Duke tough in the first round last year before losing, and it features a starting lineup that includes three seniors plus sophomore guard C. ESPN doesn't say how many brackets it has on the women's side.

NCAA National Champion 2018-19 - To Win Outright


At NCAAs, six women produced their 52 points. In the , Irby ran But she was just. Had she finished 2nd exactly one second faster , Stanford would have won the team title. All else being equal, we prefer that the national champion also win its conference meet as it gives the sport more legitimacy — although wild-card teams have been known to win the World Series and Super Bowl.

Manzano was well aware of the streak as he has pinned the following tweet to his Twitter account. It feels so good to finally be under sub4 in the mile!! Thank you all for always supporting me!!

For a full meet recap, check out the recap that a couple of LetsRun HS visitors wrote: We feel naming our passwords after Manzano cursed him. The LetsRun curse has been lifted- Leo Manzano has broken sub 4.

What athlete should we name the LRC passwords after now?? Biological boys go at girls state finals in Connecticut… awkward finish video. Terry Miller of Bulkeley wins the m girls dash i. Tuohy, who won the NXN title in the fall, is having an incredible year. According to an astute messageboard poster, here is how their HS track PRs compare. Remember, when Cain graduated high school in , she had won two U.

Tuohy might be a better cross country runner than Cain, but in an absolute sense, Cain clearly had the better career though Tuohy still has two years remaining.

Historians, who is the greatest female HS distance runner in US history? Could it already be Katelyn Tuohy? National-caliber distance runner Katelyn Tuohy, a sophomore at North Rockland, taking the 1, Nysphsaa Rochester ROC lohudinsider lohud pic. Johnson jjDandC June 9, She just knew this was the big time. I was so nervous. Miltenberg has a special bond with McGorty as he was part of his first group of recruits to The Farm and the guy Miltenberg knew he wanted to build his team around.

I hope I can produce results. As for results, Niiya ran 9: Niiya, 30, sounds like an amazing interview as she also voiced her displeasure about being given bib Everything about her says champion, from her work ethic to her determination to her mental toughness.

For the record, LetsRun. Everyone in the world has some chance. But rounding to the nearest percentage point, they are zero. If you multiply her odds by five and round to the nearest percentage point, he still believes they are zero — meaning her odds are greater than 1, to 1.

Can Gwen Jorgensen pull off one of the greatest feats in Olympic history? Rupp, who brought his glove with him to Chicago, did a pretty good job of it, although it would certainly have been called a ball as it was high and outside. For fun, we tracked down the first pitches of Des Linden and Meb Keflezighi in recent years so you can compare all three below.

Whose pitch did you like the most? This is not the kind of bracket picking advice you hear on sports radio. In fact, we often employ contrarian strategies that exploit irrational hype created by the mainstream sports media. When we started TeamRankings.

In short, we understood the science behind maximizing our odds to win a pool. We knew we needed to have accurate, unbiased predictions for any possible NCAA tournament matchup. We also knew we needed to apply game theory principles, evaluating the risk vs. However, collecting and processing the data we needed to do all this analysis took a Herculean effort. We tracked the historical accuracy of different college basketball ratings and predictive systems from around the web, and incorporated the best ones into our research.

We monitored the betting markets. We pored over the latest player injury data. We used whatever sources we could to get a sense of teams likely to be overrated or underrated by our competitors in bracket pools. That process worked very well in terms of generating results. We were winning bracket pools much more often than a typical player would expect to win, but the research was exhausting. As bona fide nerds, we had the math chops to manipulate large data sets and do complex analyses, but Excel has its limitations and the time pressure was intense.

As a result, we were still making some judgment calls or doing manual, "back of the envelope" type of calculations to make some pick decisions, especially when the numbers for Team A vs.

Team B looked really close. Although our approach to picking brackets was highly intelligent, there was plenty of opportunity to improve it. We wanted our process of optimizing bracket picks to be less hectic, and we wanted to be more confident that we had come up with the "right answer" -- the bracket that gave us the best possible chance to win.

Fast forward to This is what we do for a living. Today, we use the power of technology to analyze bracket pool picks with a level of precision that no human analyst can ever hope to match.

First, we aggregate thousands of data points on every tournament team, from power ratings to Vegas odds to public picking trends.